|
A. The Journal
Shakespeare Quarterly was founded in 1950. According to the Quarterly's
website, the journal was founded by the Shakespeare Association of America.
"Housed and published by the Folger Shakespeare Library since 1972,
SQ is the world's foremost journal focusing on all aspects of Shakespeare
studies. Topics for essays and notes cover criticism of the plays and
poems, theater history, Shakespeare pedagogy, the history of Shakespeare
as an institution, and studies in editing, text, canon, and bibliography.
"Shakespeare Performed," publishing review-essays on Royal Shakespeare
Company and other significant stage and film productions around the world,
is a regular feature. Each issue also includes book reviews on Shakespeare
and related subjects." The volume which I examined did not have a
special topic. This article was one of only three articles published in
the volume, along with 15 book reviews.
B. Introduction
In his introduction, Mr. Mallin attempts to demonstrate how the film Last
Action Hero and its star, Arnold Schwarzeneggar, act as Hamlet
paratext ("a version beyond, or contrary to the originary text while
remaining broadly referential to it"). The author intends to use
several examples of how the film fits the category of Hamlet paratext,
and how the film comments on Shakespeare's work. The author is clear and
simple in the presentation of his introductory argument.
C. Expectations
My expectation from the introduction was that this would be an interesting
analysis of the film Last Action Hero, and comparison to the themes
and characters of Hamlet. I believe that the article is successful
in interpreting Hamlet in a fresh and contemporary context. I was
amazed at how thorough and convincing the author makes his argument throughout
the article. Throughout his essay, Mallin uses character, plot references
within Last Action Hero as well as more abstract analysis of the
film's star (Schwarzeneggar) as a "text" to compare the film
to Hamlet. Somehow, I didn't expect there would be a lot in common
between the film and play. I believe that the author expects many readers
to be skeptical of his topic, but in the end he is very convincing in
making his arguments. Finally, this is the best title that I've ever seen
in a scholarly journal! It immediately caught my attention to read further.
|